
Kathy Cummins, left, who has been employed at the Saline County Clerk’s office for 15 years, and Julie Dunn, right, who has been employed there for almost 28 years, were fired from their jobs on April 4 due to some contrived “reasons” as devised by outgoing county clerk Kim Buchanan, which action caused a firestorm on April 5 at the courthouse, and at a meeting held to deal with the matter.
SALINE CO. – As predicted even prior to the March Primary Election, things are going from bad to worse with the office of one individual who is now a lame duck in Saline County.
That’d be County Clerk Kim Buchanan, who lost her bid to retain the office for a third term in the March 20 Primary to challenger, county board member Roger Craig.
Buchanan stepped in it and squished it up betwixt her toes when, on April 5, she fired two long-time employees from her office, Kathy Cummins, who has held her job at the clerk’s office for 15 years; and Julie Dunn, who’s been employed at the office for almost 28 years.
Dunn, it might be noted, is the Democrat challenger for the office of County Clerk, and will be facing Republican Craig in the November election.
The two were the senior-most employees at the office, but in the past year and a half or so, their responsibilities have been diminished by Buchanan, who took those responsibilities from the women who knew best how to run things in the office, and gave them to new hires, who simply didn’t know what they were doing and who subsequently made a mess of operations at the clerk’s office.
Additionally, the two are part of Laborer’s International Union of North America Local 773, meaning that Buchanan’s arbitrary termination of them is now going to have to be part of union efforts to reinstate, something that could be costly to all involved…including the taxpayers of Saline County.
Initially, when the whole thing exploded on the morning of Friday, April 6, there was no clear indication of why Buchanan fired the two.
However, it later came out that Buchanan’s reasons for firing the two women were “gross workplace misconduct, insolence and insubordination, possible mail fraud and compromisaton of technical security between the county and a state agency.”
Interestingly, most of those factors (other than “compromisation,” which isn’t a word; Buchanan, who isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, probably meant “compromising”) were actually what auditors, examining Buchanan’s department’s books from November 2017 to January 2018, found to be problems Buchanan had herself been guilty of.
Why no criminal action has been taken on the expensive forensic audit remains unknown at this time, unless whatever prosecution might actually go down is giving Buchanan enough rope to hang herself.
That she’s been doing since the election, over which, it’s been reported, Buchanan was fuming.
It was fully anticipated that she would lash out, but so quickly and with such inexplicable ferocity probably wasn’t something that was anticipated.
Now, Buchanan has been slacking at the already-slack office: The office is closed over noon hour when most people who need deeds, birth certificates or other documents but have to work and can’t make it in any other time need to come in; staff is overworked when they are in the office because few have been properly trained and there’s a lot of “cleaning up after” general day-to-day messes; and Buchanan herself is there only intermittently, coming in to “start fires,” according to courthouse staff, and then leaving when the fire-starting has sufficiently rowdied up the bunch that’s still working for her.
On the morning of the announcement that the two ladies had been fired, even Buchanan’s most recent hire, the offensive Jeremy Stroud, was whining about how “I didn’t sign up for this. This is crazy.”
Buchanan, however, has been steadily bringing this whole thing on herself, ever since the death of Mike Henshaw in March of 2017 made any possible prosecution of Buchanan and her alleged misdeeds out of the realm of probability.

County board member and Republican candidate for County Clerk Roger Craig defeated Buchanan at the Primary ballot box on March 20, and since that time, Buchanan has been increasingly more ill-behaved than normal, staying away from her duly-elected office…and conducting some spurious doings, as outlined in this article.
Duties of payroll and other responsibilities had been removed from Buchanan and, as reported in the March issue, prompted her to file a lawsuit to reinstate those duties. As noted in that article, Henshaw (as the county’s legal counsel) had previously opined that Buchanan’s duties of payroll and other remittances couldn’t be removed from her, but they could be duplicated, which is something the county board did not do earlier this year, instead choosing to give those duties to county treasurer Jeff Murrie.
Since the removal, an employee, Jennifer Cain, found that $100,000 was being spent on either deceased people or found people who were not insured who should be.
Former treasurer Danny Ragan, who has been dead for almost two years, until March of 2018, was still having payments paid in on premiums, reported a county official to Disclosure.
He also reported that there were several county employees who should have been on insurance that Buchanan never signed up, which is within her job responsibilities to tend to and manage.
As an example of the nonsense continuing under Buchanan’s management, AFLAC was the insurer that a new hire a few months back had signed up with. One of his twins, age 5, was hurt by a dog and had to be hospitalized. When the man went to file the expenses for his son, he found out that no premiums had ever been taken out of his paycheck.
Disclosure’s source said that the employee tried to take it upon himself, saying that he should’ve checked his pay stubs more carefully so that he’d have caught the fact that there weren’t any deductions, but, as he also said, “Who thinks about that? You just assume that the people who are supposed to take the deductions out know what they are doing and do it right.”
But that’s not what happened, and the little boy wasn’t covered at a time when he was facing significant medical expenses. So Roger Craig, who knew a guy at AFLAC, started making calls on a Saturday, and the AFLAC rep was able to get the top people to say that if two months’ worth of back premiums were paid immediately, they could establish coverage on the little boy. That was done, and he was able to have expenses covered.
That quick action on Craig’s part might’ve forestalled a lawsuit against the county that could’ve been catastrophic.
Another incident occurred with another county employee who had either an accident or health issue that necessitated a LifeFlight (the source wasn’t clear on the nature of the situation, only that it had occurred and some of the features of the occurrence). She, too, was not covered when she thought she was, and went through the steps of using her perceived insurance until she was told she didn’t have any.
Additionally (and in something that is extremely disturbing, given the way elections are going these days), Craig says the county spent $121,000 for new election equipment this election that Buchanan initially lied about.
At first, he said, she told the county board that the equipment cost only $15,000; then it turns up that “payment 1” was $14,000, headed toward the total of $121,000.
On February 15, Buchanan was observed toting files out of her office, not only by a witness, but also this action was caught on camera operated by the sheriff’s department. She was subsequently told not to remove any files or anything else from her office, but she continues to do this.
It’s being reported that there is a barn somewhere in the vicinity that is holding election equipment that is county property. The board attempted to get her to tell them where the old equipment was. Her answer: “I’m not prepared to answer that at this time.”
That was also the answer she gave when asked officially what the reason for the termination of the two women was. However, that changed to the nonsensical reason given later, which union officials have jumped on. And, at a special meeting called to address the subject on April 11, union rep Julie Simpson advised that the chances at getting the two women back on the job are “very good,” since Buchanan, as is her apparently-oblivious-to-reality way of doing things, didn’t take the proper steps to dismiss the ladies per union regulations.
In the interim of the reinstatement process, the county board voted that night to continue to pay insurance premiums for Dunn and Cummins, so that they and their families will be doing without while the procedure drags on.
That step might not be necessary, however, if a proposal to find the ladies employment in another county department is followed through on; that proposal was fronted at the April 11 meeting, with the outcome pending what other officeholders might be willing to do. There are some retirees moving out of certain positions that either of the ladies are qualified to fill. If they’re moved to those positions, the insurance premiums will of course be paid, alleviating all the aforementioned problems.
Except, of course, for Buchanan.
Whatever other havoc she chooses to wreak is what’s on the minds of many throughout the county, which is already experiencing deeply-rooted problems of rampant crime, high taxes, few jobs and plenty of backbiting.
Whatever of the former of those problem she might’ve helped create or perpetuate, Buchanan has elevated the latter statement to an art form, and seems hell-bent on continuing it right up until she is unseated by whichever candidate – Craig or Dunn – is sworn in on December 4, 2018.