State Sen. Andy Manar introduced Senate Bill 16 in an effort to distribute school funds more evenly across the state. The bill proposes that a portion of the revenue from wealthier districts is distributed to poorer districts to make students’ education statewide more equal. The passed the Illinois Senate in May but did not get a vote in the House. It’s expected to be re-introduced when the new, 99th General Assembly convenes in January.

In Illinois, much local education funding comes from property taxes within the district. Areas with higher property values pay higher property taxes, meaning more money is then funneled into the schools in the area. SB 16 would devise a formula to move some money from the wealthier districts to less-affluent schools.

State education funding in Illinois is determined through two different grants given to the districts. The Illinois State Board of Education says that the first grant is a basic action designed to make sure each district has enough money to meet state per-pupil spending guidelines.

From the ISBE:

No district receives the full Foundation Level per pupil –instead they receive an amount that, when combined with local resources per pupil, achieves the Foundation Level.

This is what the ISBE says about the second grant, which is intended to assist low-income students in a given district:

The second grant is the supplemental GSA grant for low-income students. This grant, which is not equalized, is based on the proportion of low-income students in a district. The amount paid through this grant increases as the proportion of low-income students in a district increases.

The formula used means that the more low-income students in a district, the more money per student the state gives that district. In 2014, the Illinois government received $1.93 billion in these General State Aid poverty claims in 2014, up nealy 9 percent from 2013. Districts must meet public health, student attendance and curricular requirements to receive this money.

In fiscal year 2014, the Illinois state government spent $9.8 billion on education. Gov.-elect Bruce Rauner has said he would like to increase the state’s education budget through increased efficiency in other areas.

Even though the U.S. Constitution says that public education financial regulaitons and funding are to be managed at the state level, schools still receive federal money. The U.S. Department of Education says this is because “[t]here is also a compelling national interest in the quality of the nation’s public schools.” Congress has therefore set aside legislative mechanisms to give extra support beyond state help, such as Title I and Reading First. 

The U.S. federal government spent about $141 billion, or 4 percent of the entire budget, on education in the 2014 fiscal year, says the New America Foundation. Some of this money is sent straight to the individual districts and some is sent to the state and then distributed to districts. States can decide whether or not to accept this grant money.

The New America Foundation presented this chart of the Department of Education’s 2014 allocations:

dept of ed 2014 funding

Advance Illinois says Illinois public schools have lost $1.4 billion since 2010 due to funding cuts, a fact the organization blames partly on the state’s overall economic crisis. By Illinois state law, each school must spend at least $6,000 per year on every student. Many schools were unable to meet that requirement in 2013 because only 89 percent of required state funds were disbursed.

From Advance Illinois:

The budget cut most hurts disadvantaged districts. The 20 percent of students enrolled in the poorest school districts are losing $160 million in general state education funds due to proration this year, while the 20 percent of students in school districts with the fewest poor students are losing $30 million. 

But before Illinoisans can figure out what the best reform plan is, we’ve got to understand what’s happening currently. On average, Illinois schools get most of their funding from local sources–66 percent. State funding makes up 26.1 percent of Illinois districts’ money and 7.9 percent of their money comes from federal money. There are a total of 2,072,991 students enrolled in Illinois’ public schools in, according to Megan Griffin at the ISBE, 864 Category 2 public school districts.

state average

Here are the percentages of local, state and federal funding the top 10 biggest (by enrollment), top 10 smallest and 10 median-sized school districts in the state according to the Illinois State Board of Education.

Districts with the top 10 highest enrollment during the 2013-2014 school year:

1. Chicago Public Schools

chicago district funding

Enrollment: 400,994

2014 Budget: $5.3 billion

Local funding: $2.7 billion

State funding: $1.9 billion

Federal Funding: $800.9 million

2. SD U-46 

sd u-46

Enrollment: 40,537

2014 budget: $450 million

Local funding: $305.5 million

State funding: $108.4 million

Federal funding: $35.5 million

3. Rockford SD 205

rockford 205

Enrollment: 29,160

2014 budget: $370 million

Local funding: $194.6 million

State funding: $129.9 million

Federal funding: $45.5 million

4. Indian Prairie CUSD 204 

indian prairie

Enrollment: 28,706

2014 budget: $320 million

Local funding: $271.4 million

State funding: $38.4 million

Federal funding: $10.2 million

5. Plainfield SD 202

plainfield

Enrollment: 28,560

2014 budget: $260 million

Local funding: $176.8 million

State funding: $72.3 million

Federal funding: $10.7 million

6. CUSD 300

cusd 300

Enrollment: 20,888

2014 budget: $220 million

Local funding: $172.2 million

State funding: $29.5 million

Federal funding: $14.3 million

7. Valley View CUSD 365U

valley view

Enrollment: 17,704

2014 budget: $220 million

Local funding: $164.3 million

State funding: $41.1 million

Federal funding: $14.3 million

8. Oswego CUSD 308

oswego

Enrollment: 17,605

2014 budget: $190 million

Local funding: $137.4 million

State funding: $48.3 million

Federal funding: $4.4 million

9. Naperville CUSD 203

naperville

Enrollment: 17,271

2014 budget: $250 million

Local funding: $218.5 million

State funding: $24.3 million

Federal funding: $7.3 million

10. Waukegan CUSD 60

waukegan

Enrollment: 16,899

2014 budget: $220 million

Local funding: $82.6 million

State funding: $119.5 million

Federal funding: $18.5 million

Districts with the 10 median-biggest enrollments:

1. Hazel Crest SD 152-5

hazel crest

Enrollment: 957 students

2014 budget: $14 million

Local funding: $6.4 million

State funding: $6.2 million

Federal funding: $1.5 million

2. Casey-Westfield CUSD 4C

casey-westfield

Enrollment: 954

2014 budget: $9  million

Local funding: $3.8 million

State funding: $4.5 million

Federal funding: $666,000

3. Chester CUSD 139

chester

Enrollment: 948

2014 budget: $9 million

Local funding: $3.6 million

State funding: $4.6 million

Federal funding: $792,000

4. Illini Bluffs CUSD 327

illini bluffs

Enrollment: 942

2014 budget: $9 million

Local funding: $6.7 million

State funding: $1.9 million

Federal funding: $351,000

5. South Holland SD 150

south holland

Enrollment: 939

2014 budget: $10 million

Local funding: $7.3 million

State funding: $1.8  million

Federal funding: $870,000

6. Hoover-Schrum Memorial SD 157

hoover-schrum

Enrollment: 938

2014 budget: $14 million

Local funding: $9.8 million

State funding: $2.9 million

Federal funding: $1.4 million

7. West Central CUSD 235

west central

Enrollment: 934

2014 budget: $7.7 million

Local funding: $3.6 million

State funding: $3.5 million

Federal funding: $523,600

8. Putnam County CUSD 535

putnam county

Enrollment: 926

2014 budget: $9.5 million

Local funding: $7.4 million

State funding: $1.6 million

Federal funding: $427,000

9. Centralia HSD 200

centralia

Enrollment: 925

2014 budget: $12 million

Local funding: $5.8 million

State funding: $5.4 million

Federal funding: $768,000

10. Pecatonica CUSD 321

pecatonica

Enrollment: 918

2014 budget: $10 million

Local funding: $6.8 million

State funding: $2.9 million

Federal funding: $250,000

10 smallest districts by enrollment:

1. Lostant CUSD 425

lostant

Enrollment: 70

2014 budget: $1.7 million

Local funding: $1.3 million

State funding: $351,900

Federal funding: $83,300

2. Buncombe Cons SD 43

buncombe

Enrollment: 67

2014 budget: $650,000

Local funding: $208,650

State funding: $366,6000

Federal funding: $74,750

3. Farrington CCSD 99

farrington

Enrollment: 64

2014 budget: $540,000

Local funding: $122,040

State funding: $326,160

Federal funding: $91,800

4. Steward ESD 220

steward

Enrollment: 63

2014 budget: $1.1 million

Local funding: $864,600

State funding: $160,600

Federal funding: $75,900

5. McClellan CCSD 12

mcclellan

Enrollment: 61

2014 budget: $460,000

Local funding: $219,880

State funding: $205,160

Federal funding: $34,960

6. Hoyleton Cons SD 29

hoyleton

Enrollment: 58

2014 budget: $810,000

Local funding: $478,710

State funding: $290,790

Federal funding: $41,310

7. Dalzell SD 98

dalzell

Enrollment: 55

2014 budget: $610,000

Local funding: $253,760

State funding: $322,080

Federal funding: $34,160

8. Rooks Creek CCSD 425

rooks creek

Enrollment: 48

2014 budget: $810,000

Local funding: $633,420

State funding: $136,890

Federal funding: $39,690

9. Cherry SD 92

cherry

Enrollment: 45

2014 budget: $700,000

Local funding: $421,400

State funding: $240,100

Federal funding: $38,500

10. Ohio CHSD 505

ohio

Enrollment: 34

2014 budget: $1.3 million

Local funding: $1.1 million

State funding: $152,100

Federal funding: $24,700

Overall, it seems that larger districts are more locally funded, with some notable exceptions, such as Illini Bluffs and Waukegan. The districts with more students are more likely to be located in larger metropolitan areas where property values, and therefore property taxes, are higher. (Even in districts with small enrollments, the schools with the bigger budgets tend to see a higher portion of their funding come from local sources, such as Ohio CHSD 505.) This is especially true in the Chicago suburbs. That means that if SB 16 passes, overall, many suburban districts will be giving money to smaller districts in central or southern Illinois.

NEXT ARTICLE: Andy Manar: Zip code should not determine the quality of any child’s education

[RECOMMENDED]

  1. What’s really going on with higher education in Illinois?
  2. Bruce Rauner’s 5 proposals for Illinois education reform
  3. Which education fields have the biggest surplus of qualified Illinois teachers?
  4. A quick look at property taxes, home values by county in Illinois
  5. Want to tell your elected officials what you think of the state of government in Illinois? Use our Sound Off tool.